Use of standardized patients in the assessment of medical practice.
نویسنده
چکیده
Since the inception of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination in 1976, we have had a mechanism in Canada of identifying preventive interventions that, if instituted by Canadian physicians, are expected to improve the health of the country’s population. Yet substantial disparities appear to exist between optimal institution of preventive care recommendations and actual practice. In articles presented in this issue, Dr. Brian Hutchison and colleagues have attempted to overcome some of the limitations of previous studies by means of blinded evaluation of practice using standardized patients (pages 185 and 197). “Standardized patients” are people trained to present, accurately and reproducibly, the problems that would be evident in a real patient. Theoretically, blinded assessment of practice by means of standardized patients should provide a number of scientific advantages over more conventional methods of practice assessment. First, researchers can select the exact problem they wish to study and can prospectively establish and collect information on case-specific standards of performance. Second, the need to adjust for differences in the kinds of patients seen by different physicians is eliminated because the “same patient” is presented to all physicians. Third, the problems of incomplete documentation with chart audit and overestimation in self-reporting are addressed by having the standardized patient record the actions taken by the physician during the visit. When this information is coupled with chart documentation, as well as the referral, test and prescription recommendations generated by the visit, a more comprehensive and accurate picture of a physician’s practice should emerge. The use of standardized patients has a place in the methodological armamentarium of health care research, but like all methods it has pitfalls. The “valueadded” component only prevails if 5 conditions are met: a specific question is posed that can be assessed by a limited number of standardized patient cases, blinding is maintained, the patient’s presentation is standardized, the standardized patient accurately records relevant details of the visit, and the aspect of performance to be assessed can be evaluated during the first visit. The study of physician performance by Hutchison and colleagues is a good example of the use of standardized patients to evaluate a specific research question — the determinants of adherence to evidence-based preventive guidelines. It was feasible to train the standardized patients to assess physician performance, there were no major physical findings that needed to be standardized, and there was minimum risk that the problem presented would have led to invasive interventions during the visit or deferral of care of real patients. These latter issues must be considered in judging the suitability of standardized patient assessment and the ethical and legal implications of blinded practice assessment. If the physician believes that the standardized patient has an acute problem, one that requires immediate intervention, then not only is the standardized patient at risk, but resources may be inappropriately diverted from real patients. For example, in one case involving an elderly person with abdominal pain, the physician requested emergency abdominal ultrasonography, necessitating overtime pay to hospital technicians. In a second case, a physician wanted to give cortisone injections to a standardized patient presenting with chronic hip pain. The main pitfall in using standardized patients to answer questions about practice behaviour is the technical restriction that physicians with closed practices (in the study reported in this issue, 48% of the 480 physicians who responded to the initial survey) have to be excluded. When this limitation is coupled with low participation rates, estimates of the prevalence of preventive care as well as their determinants may be biased. Editorial
منابع مشابه
Standardized patients versus simulated patients in medical education: are they the same or different
In order to equip medical students with all the necessary skills in dealing with patients to provide optimal treatment, the need for the use of real patients in educational settings has become prominent. But all the required skills cannot be practiced on real patients due to patients’ safety and well-being. Thus, the use of standardized patients (SPs) or simulated patients (SiPs) as a substitut...
متن کاملComment on the Newly Developed Consciousness Assessment Scale; AVPU Plus
I read with interest a recent paper in your journal, in which three consciousness assessment scales were compared in poisoned patients and finally a new scale "AVPU plus" was proposed (1). The study was very interesting with a worthy objective. I would like to admire the authors for exploring how the Alert/Verbal/Painful/Unresponsive (AVPU) responsive scale corresponds with the Glasgow Coma Sca...
متن کاملThe Effect of Interactive Educational Workshops with or Without Standardized Patients on the Self-Efficacy of Midwifery Students in Sexual Health Counseling
Background & aim: Modifications in learning systems based on the concepts of self-efficacy and self-esteem are among the suggested strategies to bridge the gap between knowledge and practice. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of two interactive educational workshops with or without standardized patients (SPs) on midwifery students' self-efficacy in providing sexual health counseli...
متن کاملPatient-Based Assessment of Effectiveness of Voice Therapy in Vocal Mass Lesions with Secondary Muscle Tension Dysphonia
Introduction: Use of patient-based voice assessment scales is an appropriate method that is frequently used to demonstrate effectiveness of voice therapy. This study was aimed at determining the effectiveness ofvoice therapy among patients with secondary muscle tension dysphonia (MTD) and vocal mass lesions. Materials and Methods: The study design was prospective, with within-participant repe...
متن کاملAssessment of knowledge and quality of practice of proper foot care in Iranian patients with type 2 diabetes
Background: Uncontrolled diabetes can lead to a high rate of complications. Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU), leading to significant morbidity. However, DFU can be prevented and managed through education of patient foot care. Objectives: The current study aimed to evaluate the knowledge and practice routines of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) regarding foot care. Methods: A questionnaire was de...
متن کاملEvaluation the knowledge and practice of dentists to the use of protective glass to prevent eye injuries in dentists, personals, and patients in Zanjan city, 1399
Background and Aim: Various factors cause damage to the eyes of dentists, staff and patients during dental procedures. Due to the presence of microbial agents in saliva, it is necessary to pay attention to eye protection. However, according to studies, only 62-52% of dentists use personal protective equipment. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the knowledge and practice of dentists regar...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne
دوره 158 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1998